Read more
Alright, let's tackle this problem step by step. It's a bit involved, but by breaking it down, we can find the value of
for which the light ray emerges at a distance cm from the bottom of the configuration.
Understanding the Configuration
We have identical units stacked vertically. Each unit consists of three layers:
First layer (Air):
Height: cm
Refractive index: (since it's air)
Second layer:
Thickness: cm (we'll find later)
Refractive index:
Third layer:
Thickness: cm (same as the second layer)
Refractive index:
A light source is placed at the top of the first unit. A light ray is incident on the second layer of the first unit at an angle of to the normal.
Determining the Thickness
First, we need to find the thickness of the second and third layers. The problem states that the first layer (air) has height cm, and the second and third layers have equal thickness . However, the exact value of isn't directly given.
But looking at the height of the air column , it's given by a formula involving :
But the problem states:
This seems to be a given value, not expressed in terms of . So perhaps is to be determined based on the refractive indices and the angles, but since all units are identical, must be consistent across all units.
Alternatively, maybe the height is fixed, and is also fixed, and we're to find based on the given emergent distance .
Given that, let's proceed by analyzing the path of the light ray through one unit and then generalize for units.
Path of Light Through One Unit
Let's trace the light ray through one unit:
First Layer (Air):
The light starts at and travels through air at to the normal.
The height is cm.
The horizontal displacement in air can be found using the angle:
Second Layer (Refractive index ):
The light enters the second layer at .
Using Snell's law at the air-second layer interface:
The horizontal displacement in the second layer:
Third Layer (Refractive index ):
The light exits the second layer and enters the third layer.
Using Snell's law at the second-third layer interface:
The horizontal displacement in the third layer:
Total Horizontal Displacement per Unit
The total horizontal displacement after one unit is:
But we can find :
So,
This seems complicated, and we don't know . Maybe there's a simpler approach.
Alternative Approach: Net Deviation per Unit
Notice that after passing through one unit, the light exits parallel to its original direction because:
At the second-third interface, .
The light exits the third layer back into air (or the next unit's first layer, which is air), and by symmetry, the angle will return to .
Wait, let's check the exit angle from the third layer:
After the third layer, the light enters air again (or the next unit's air layer). Applying Snell's law:
So, the light exits each unit at the same angle it entered, meaning the net angular deviation is zero per unit. Therefore, the horizontal displacement per unit is constant.
Calculating Horizontal Displacement per Unit
From the first layer (air):
From the second layer:
From the third layer:
Total per unit:
This still seems messy. Maybe is such that the terms simplify.
Alternatively, perhaps the layers' thicknesses are related such that the total horizontal shift per unit is simple.
Given that the emergent distance after units is , and the per-unit shift is (from air), maybe:
But let's verify if the per-unit shift is indeed .
From the air layer, the shift is . If the other layers don't contribute to the net shift (since the angle returns to ), then the total shift is .
Given , then .
Verifying No Net Angular Deviation
After each unit, the light exits at , same as entry, so the net angular deviation is zero. Thus, the horizontal shift accumulates linearly with the number of units.
Conclusion
The value of is 7.
Final Answer
The value of is .
0 Reviews