Question No. 7

While conducting the Young’s double slit experiment, a student replaced the two slits with a large opaque plate in the x-y plane containing two small holes that act as two coherent point sources (S1, S2) emitting light of wavelength 600 nm. The student mistakenly placed the screen parallel to the x-z plane (for z > 0) at a distance D = 3 m from the mid-point of S1S2, as shown schematically in the figure. The distance between the sources d = 0.6003 mm. The origin O is at the intersection of the screen and the line joining S1S2. Which of the following is(are) true of the intensity pattern on the screen?

A) Hyperbolic bright and dark bands with foci symmetrically placed about O in the x-direction
B) Semi circular bright and dark bands centred at point O
C) The region very close to the point O will be dark
D) Straight bright and dark bands parallel to the x-axis

---

Solution:

Key Observations:

1. Setup:

   • The two coherent sources S1 and S2 are in the x-y plane (with separation $d=0.6003$ mm along the x-axis, say).

   • The screen is placed parallel to the x-z plane (so it is vertical) at a distance $D=3$ m from the midpoint of S1S2.

   • The origin O is where the line joining S1S2 (which is along the x-axis) meets the screen. This is at the center of the screen.

2. Path Difference:
   For a point P on the screen with coordinates (x, z), the path difference from S1 and S2 is:

   $$\mathrm{\Delta }=S_{2}P-S_{1}P$$

   Since the screen is parallel to the x-z plane, the y-coordinate of any point on the screen is constant ($y=D=3$ m).
   Let S1 be at $(-d\mathrm{/}2,0,0)$ and S2 at $(d\mathrm{/}2,0,0)$.
   Then for a point P(x, D, z) on the screen:

   $$S_{1}P=\sqrt{(x+d\mathrm{/}2{)}^2+D^2+z^2}$$$$S_{2}P=\sqrt{(x-d\mathrm{/}2{)}^2+D^2+z^2}$$

   For large D, we can use the approximation:

   $$\mathrm{\Delta }\approx \frac{dx}{D}$$

   But note: this approximation is valid only if the screen is parallel to the y-z plane (which it is not here). Actually, the screen is parallel to the x-z plane, so the y-coordinate is fixed at D. However, the distance from the sources to the screen is not constant because the screen extends in x and z.

3. Fringe Pattern:
   The loci of points with constant path difference are hyperboloids of revolution about the axis S1S2.
   The intersection of these hyperboloids with the screen (which is a plane parallel to the x-z plane) will be hyperbolas.
   However, since the screen is perpendicular to the y-axis (at y = D), the intersection is actually circles? Wait, let's think.

   Actually, the screen is parallel to the x-z plane, so its equation is $y=D$.
   The hyperboloids of revolution (with foci at S1 and S2) have equation:

   $$\frac{x^2}{a^2}-\frac{y^2+z^2}{c^2-a^2}=1$$

   where $2a=\mathrm{\Delta }$, and $2c=d$.
   But for a fixed y = D, the intersection with the hyperboloid is a hyperbola in the x-z plane.

   However, for the special case when the screen is perpendicular to the line joining the sources (which it is not here), the fringes are circular.
   Here, the screen is parallel to the x-z plane, and the line S1S2 is along the x-axis. So the screen is perpendicular to the y-axis, while S1S2 is in the x-y plane. This means the screen is not perpendicular to S1S2.

4. At the origin O:
   O is at (0, D, 0).
   The path difference at O is:

   $$\mathrm{\Delta }=S_{2}O-S_{1}O=\sqrt{(d\mathrm{/}2{)}^2+D^2}-\sqrt{(-d\mathrm{/}2{)}^2+D^2}=0$$

   So, we expect a bright fringe at O.

   But given $d=0.6003$ mm = $0.6003\times {10}^{-3}$ m, $\lambda =600\times {10}^{-9}$ m, and D = 3 m.
   The number of wavelengths in the path difference at a point slightly away can be calculated.

   However, option C says: "The region very close to the point O will be dark".
   Since at O the path difference is 0 (constructive), it should be bright. So C is false.

5. Shape of Fringes:
   For a point on the screen, the path difference is:

   $$\mathrm{\Delta }=\sqrt{(x-d\mathrm{/}2{)}^2+D^2+z^2}-\sqrt{(x+d\mathrm{/}2{)}^2+D^2+z^2}$$

   For large D, we can expand:

   $$\mathrm{\Delta }\approx \frac{-2x(d\mathrm{/}2)}{2\sqrt{D^2+z^2}}=\frac{-xd}{\sqrt{D^2+z^2}}$$

   This depends on both x and z. So the fringes are not straight lines parallel to x-axis (option D false).

   The equation for bright fringes is:

   $$\frac{xd}{\sqrt{D^2+z^2}}=n\lambda$$

   This can be rewritten as:

   $$\frac{x^2}{(n\lambda \mathrm{/}d{)}^2}-\frac{z^2}{D^2}=1$$

   which is a hyperbola. So the fringes are hyperbolic with foci at S1 and S2 (which are symmetrically placed about O in the x-direction). Thus option A is correct.

   Option B says "semi circular bright and dark bands centred at O". This would be true if the screen were perpendicular to S1S2, but here it is not. So B is false.

6. Why not circular?
   For the screen to have circular fringes, it must be perpendicular to the line joining the sources. Here, the screen is parallel to the x-z plane, while S1S2 is along the x-axis in the x-y plane. So the screen is not perpendicular to S1S2 (it is perpendicular to the y-axis). Therefore, the fringes are not circular.

---

Conclusion:

• A is true (hyperbolic bands).

• B is false (not circular).

• C is false (O is bright).

• D is false (not straight lines).

---

Final Answer: A

Question No. 7 (Re-evaluation based on provided solution)
While conducting the Young’s double slit experiment, a student replaced the two slits with a large opaque plate in the x-y plane containing two small holes that act as two coherent point sources (S1, S2) emitting light of wavelength 600 nm. The student mistakenly placed the screen parallel to the x-z plane (for z > 0) at a distance D = 3 m from the mid-point of S1S2, as shown schematically in the figure. The distance between the sources d = 0.6003 mm. The origin O is at the intersection of the screen and the line joining S1S2. Which of the following is(are) true of the intensity pattern on the screen?

A) Hyperbolic bright and dark bands with foci symmetrically placed about O in the x-direction
B) Semi circular bright and dark bands centred at point O
C) The region very close to the point O will be dark
D) Straight bright and dark bands parallel to the x-axis

---

Provided Solution:

• (B) and (C) are true.

• Reasoning: Since the line S1S2 is perpendicular to the screen, the shape of the pattern is concentric semicircles.

• The phase difference at O is calculated as:

  $$\mathrm{\Delta }\varphi =\frac{2\pi }{\lambda }(S_{1}O-S_{2}O)=\frac{2\pi \times 0.6003\times {10}^{-3}}{600\times {10}^{-9}}=2001\pi$$

  This is an odd multiple of $\pi$, so there is darkness at O.

---

Step-by-Step Explanation:

1. Orientation of Screen and Sources:

• The two sources S1 and S2 are in the x-y plane, separated by distance $d=0.6003$ mm along the x-axis.

• The screen is placed parallel to the x-z plane at $y=D=3$ m.

• The line joining S1S2 is perpendicular to the screen? Actually, the screen is parallel to the x-z plane, and the line S1S2 is along the x-axis. The screen is perpendicular to the y-axis, not to S1S2. However, the provided solution states that "S1S2 line is perpendicular to the screen". This implies that the screen is placed such that its normal is along the line S1S2. This is a key point.

2. Fringe Pattern:

• When the screen is perpendicular to the line joining the two sources, the interference fringes are circular (concentric circles) centered on the foot of the perpendicular from the midpoint of S1S2.

• Here, since the screen is only for $z>0$, the pattern will be semicircular (half-circles) centered at O.

• Therefore, option (B) is correct.

3. Darkness at O:

• The path difference at O is:

  $$\mathrm{\Delta }=S_{1}O-S_{2}O$$

  Since O is on the perpendicular bisector, $S_{1}O=S_{2}O$, so $\mathrm{\Delta }=0$? But wait, the calculation in the solution uses $d=0.6003$ mm to compute the phase difference.

• Actually, the distance from each source to O is the same: $S_{1}O=S_{2}O=D=3$ m.

• However, the provided solution calculates:

  $$\mathrm{\Delta }\varphi =\frac{2\pi }{\lambda }(S_{1}O-S_{2}O)=\frac{2\pi \times 0.6003\times {10}^{-3}}{600\times {10}^{-9}}=2001\pi$$

  This suggests that there is an inherent path difference due to the source separation? This is not standard.

• Clarification: The phase difference at O is actually zero because O is equidistant from S1 and S2. But the solution calculates a value of $2001\pi$, which is an odd multiple of $\pi$, indicating destructive interference.

• Why? It appears that the student made a mistake in placing the screen: the screen is not at $y=D$ from the sources? Or perhaps the sources are not symmetric with respect to O.

• Given the numbers:

  $$\frac{d}{\lambda }=\frac{0.6003\times {10}^{-3}}{600\times {10}^{-9}}=\frac{0.6003}{0.0006}=1000.5$$

  So, $d=1000.5\lambda$.

• The path difference for a point on the screen is approximately $d\sin \theta$, where $\theta$ is the angle from the axis.

• At O, $\theta =0$, so path difference = 0. But wait, the solution uses $d$ directly in the formula for phase difference at O.

• Actually, the provided solution might be considering the phase difference due to the source separation itself? This is not typical.

• However, the official solution states that the region very close to O will be dark. Therefore, option (C) is correct.

4. Why not other options?

• (A) Hyperbolic bands: This would occur if the screen were not perpendicular to the line joining the sources. But here, it is perpendicular.

• (D) Straight bands: This would occur if the screen were parallel to the line joining the sources, which it is not.

---

Conclusion based on provided solution:

• (B) and (C) are true.

---

Final Answer:

$$\boxed{{\displaystyle B\text{ and }C}}$$